From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 18:55:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6304D37B401; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC1443FA3; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:55:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4016566D74; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2C3AF675; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 18:55:05 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-ID: <20030809015505.GA2522@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030808045334.GA97079@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030809013414.GY1741@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030809013414.GY1741@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Ports scheduled for removal on Nov 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:55:06 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 11:04:14AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Thursday, 7 August 2003 at 21:53:34 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > The following ports are scheduled for removal on November 7 if they > > are still broken at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix > > them. If you are interested in saving these ports, please send your > > patches to the maintainer. If the maintainer is unresponsive or the > > port has no maintainer, then please submit them via send-pr. >=20 > I don't see anything that worries me, but some of th things look > relatively familiar. Would it not be a good idea to distribute this > list more widely so that users can be warned So far I have: * mailed the maintainers * force-committed to every affected port * mailed to the port mailing list. What more do you suggest? > and possibly pay somebody to fix them? Feel free :) Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/NFR4Wry0BWjoQKURAqv0AJ9YRHNgphyFReJp3r2djAdGE3au9QCcCSbC GywiRygwC3/wK735rHCRufA= =Otoe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--