From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 21 13:02:47 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07531065674
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:02:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6433C8FC08
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:02:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org>) id 1PgGdZ-0007Xh-QD
	for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:02:45 +0100
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:02:45 +0100
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:02:45 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:02:32 +0100
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <ihc058$9kc$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <20110119125407.be7669b9.ray@dlink.ua>	<AANLkTikjL-0t4t_R_+THy-2VUrU+LVhgrBV8Gdjx80K_@mail.gmail.com>	<20110120084955.GD1716@garage.freebsd.pl>	<20110120122644.9a38974c.ray@dlink.ua>
	<AANLkTikG7S=ErqCc8Yy6U37B7Cwv55BffnLr5tJ4VbuA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikG7S=ErqCc8Yy6U37B7Cwv55BffnLr5tJ4VbuA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GEOM_LZMA
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:02:47 -0000

On 20/01/2011 16:51, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Well, creating a generic geom_compress module shouldn't increase the
> size by all that much. It's just a few function pointers that point at
> the decompression class. The rest of the format is the same, right?
> (ie, how it's broken into chunks, the chunks are separately
> compressed, etc.)

I think they are talking about the size of the kernel :)