From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 18 18:45:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA23776 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 18:45:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from excel.tnet.com.au (excel.tnet.com.au [203.15.94.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA23768 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 18:45:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from slaterm@localhost) by excel.tnet.com.au (8.7.4/8.7.3) id KAA04964; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 10:46:33 +0800 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 10:46:33 +0800 (WST) From: Michael Slater To: "Jay D. Nelson" cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Servers (single IP) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Gentlemen, I have to jump in and add my viewpoint as a customer. > > I spend my money -- and recommend to my clients they spend their money -- > with an ISP who will deliver the service _I_ want and _I_ expect. To whit: If I need a static IP address for a good and legitimate reason -- I _will_ If any of my customers have a reason for needing a static I.P address, then they get one. I dont know how it is in the U.S these days, but in Australia as of the end of this month their will not be any more class C network addresses available. (Thats what i was told when i applied for another class C address) It seems Australia has used the _FEW_ I.P addresses that were allocated to it. So as a result,we have to make do with what we have (at least that's the impression that i get) . We always try to accomodate the needs of our customers. Michael Slater slaterm@tnet.com.au