From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 25 05:56:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA16886 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:56:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA16870; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:56:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (sji-ca7-188.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.188]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA14059; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id FAA25298; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199807251255.FAA25298@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com CC: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, scrappy@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19980725143136.A14108@klemm.gtn.com> (message from Andreas Klemm on Sat, 25 Jul 1998 14:31:36 +0200) Subject: Re: qt and mico-latest From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * > (3) Delete all but one of the qt's. * * Would be easiest solution. How about backward compatibility ? I don't know. You tell me. :) * You wanted me to do so because of the TCL/TK version mess ! * And I agreed. But possibly we have more luck with qt in terms of * backward compatibility. Did I tell you? Well sorry about that. I should have made it clear how to do it (and shlib version numbers, even MAJOR version number changes, is not the way to do it). * We should ask in ports if nobody objects nuking the other qt libs. Which one do you think we should unify on? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message