From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Wed Nov 18 04:55:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB10A31198 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 04:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E0EF122F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 04:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-213-32.knology.net [216.186.213.32] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id tAI4tdc5000610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 22:55:40 -0600 Subject: Re: [toolchain] GCC 4.8.5 compiler bug References: <564B4759.5050001@hiwaay.net> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <564C04CB.6010903@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:01:09 -0553.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 04:55:43 -0000 On 11/17/15 17:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi William, > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> I have found & apparently isolated what looks like a compiler bug in >> (pkg-installed, box-stock) gcc48 under FreeBSD 9.3R, see attached. I >> also prepped a tarball w/ the files that produced the problem for me. >> Do I post that here or to GNU ? TIA & have a good one .... > > GCC 4.8 is a little old, and most likely won't attract attention > by upstream developers. > > Does this reproduce with newer version such as GCC 5? If so, that > would make a report with higher chances of getting addressed. If > not, can you use such a newer version? > > Gerald Yes (occurred on 5.2.1 originally), that's why I bumped back to 4.8.5, I thought the newer development version might have some new 'features' that were acting up .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.