From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 23 16:25:33 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA06364 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Nov 1995 16:25:33 -0800 Received: from linux4nn.iaf.nl (root@linux4nn.iaf.nl [193.67.144.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA06359 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 1995 16:25:27 -0800 Received: from uni4nn.iaf.nl (root@uni4nn.iaf.nl [193.67.144.33]) by linux4nn.iaf.nl (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA15270; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 01:24:36 +0100 Received: by uni4nn.iaf.nl with UUCP id AA09224 (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Fri, 24 Nov 1995 01:24:41 +0100 Received: by iafnl.es.iaf.nl with UUCP id AA31758 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4); Thu, 23 Nov 1995 22:31:34 +0100 Received: (from wilko@localhost) by yedi.iaf.nl (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA00860; Thu, 23 Nov 1995 19:57:14 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte Message-Id: <199511231857.TAA00860@yedi.iaf.nl> Subject: Re: using NCR810 with 2.0.5.R To: se@zpr.uni-koeln.de (Stefan Esser) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 19:57:13 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199511222112.AA00207@Sysiphos> from "Stefan Esser" at Nov 22, 95 10:12:54 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1496 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > } When testing a NCR810 card I got cheaply (~ $20) using 205R I noticed > } some strangeness when I tried disklabel on a virgin disk. Quite a > } lot of messages from the ncr driver about some assert/assumption > } failing and then a sort of scsi bus lockup. > > What drive brand/model was that ? Saw it both a Quantum (DEC RZ28) and a Seagate 4Gb Barracuda (DEC RZ29B). I work for DEC, so that's why I do know the RZxx but not the actual model# > } it's probably not hardware. BTW Machine is a Digital Celebris P90, > } 8Mb. > > No, it's the result of a SCSI message reject, > which is not correctly dealt with by the driver. I see. > } General question: I plan to put this 810 in my to-be-bought Pentium. > } Is 205R generally stable with a 810 or do I need 2.1R ? > > 2.1R should have this fixed. You'll only need > to boot the boot floppy, since the assertion > failure is at probe time ... ? Que? What do you mean exactly? > I could send you 2.1R on tape, if this will > help your decision to do the upgrade now :) My _home_ system will wait with the upgrade till the Pentium board is installed. I could try 2.1R with a number of different drives on the machine at work. Wilko _ __________________________________________________________________________ | / o / / _ Wilko Bulte email: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl |/|/ / / /( (_) Private FreeBSD site - Arnhem - The Netherlands --------------------------------------------------------------------------------