From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 17 12:04:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA03155 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 12:04:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA03095 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 12:04:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com ([13.231.132.20]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <16148(12)>; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:40:18 PST Received: from gnu.mc.xerox.com (gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com) by gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03645; Wed, 17 Jan 96 13:40:13 EST Received: by gnu.mc.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09746; Wed, 17 Jan 96 13:40:12 EST Message-Id: <9601171840.AA09746@gnu.mc.xerox.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: Julian Elischer Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDvs Lxxxxx Flame.. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 1996 01:18:59 PST." <199601170918.BAA26568@ref.tfs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:40:08 PST From: "Marty Leisner" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Can someone provide hard information about nfs serving capability on identical hardware between linux and freebsd? I'm very disappointed at the nfs performance on linux...I've used suns for years and on a working ethernet it doesn't make much difference whether files are local or remote... On linux is makes a huge difference. -- marty leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com Member of the League for Programming Freedom