From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 29 10:54:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7156837C3C8 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:54:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm011-006.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.81.230]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22235; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:54:03 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C46091992; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:51:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:51:54 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: gnu not unix Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: roots shell == /bin/sh please Message-ID: <20000629135154.F24486@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200006291744.KAA55295@fallkiss.wraith.sf.ca.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200006291744.KAA55295@fallkiss.wraith.sf.ca.us>; from gnu@wraith.sf.ca.us on Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:44:56AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:44:56AM -0700, gnu not unix wrote: > My vote is for root's shell to be /bin/sh if anyone's counting. Mine too. > Is the /bin/sh in freebsd more buggy than, say, the solaris /bin/sh? > If so, thats's probably why it's currently /bin/csh. I doubt it; Solaris /bin/sh is likely more buggy. > I could also live with /bin/bash as root's shell. > Not sure why bash is not part of freebsd "core" anyways. Because BASH is infected by the GPV? =) -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message