From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 30 01:49:12 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 86CFC16A4CE; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:49:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (chiark.greenend.org.uk
	[193.201.200.170])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AC0EA43FD7; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:49:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fanf@chiark.greenend.org.uk)
Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local
	id 1AF9QF-00020w-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:48:55 +0000
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:48:55 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20031030094855.GD22725@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <200310290918.h9T9IiwQ095857@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20031029095700.GU84474@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<20031029101805.GA24695@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
	<20031029.223237.01027561.imp@bsdimp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031029.223237.01027561.imp@bsdimp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
cc: ertr1013@student.uu.se
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: mbr@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/rpc clnt_simple.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:49:12 -0000

On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:32:37PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> Yes.  More correct.  For the same reason that
> 
>       while (foo) {
>       ...
>       }
> 
> is more correct than:
> 
> top:
> 	if (foo) goto out;
> 	...
> 	goto top;
> out:

Part of the point of a style guide is it helps to avoid basic traps
and pitfalls :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
BAILEY: NORTHEAST 7 TO SEVERE GALE 9. OCCASIONAL RAIN. MODERATE.