From owner-freebsd-security Fri Apr 20 10:54:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from uadvg135.cms.usa.net (uadvg135.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C86E37B423 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from briant@packeteer.com) Received: (qmail 6765 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2001 17:54:35 -0000 Received: from uadvg129.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.129) by corprelay.cms.usa.net with SMTP; 20 Apr 2001 17:54:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 14059 invoked by uid 0); 20 Apr 2001 17:54:34 -0000 Received: USA.NET MXFirewall, messaging filters applied; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:54:33 GMT Received: from packeteer.com [207.78.98.2] by uadvg129 (ASMTP/briant@postoffice.packeteer.com) via mtad (53CM.0401.1.03) with ESMTP id 491FDTR3G0330M20; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:54:33 GMT Message-ID: <3AE0780F.BAF16352@packeteer.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:55:27 -0700 From: Brian Tiemann Organization: Packeteer, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Rob Simmons , Ben Vaughn , Chris Faulhaber , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another glob problem References: <20010419164947.M72854-100000@mail.wlcg.com> <3ADF7BDD.A7868DA@packeteer.com> <20010419180118.C54774@xor.obsecurity.org> <3ADF8C73.7E987982@packeteer.com> <20010419181459.B57373@xor.obsecurity.org> <3ADF8EFB.1B6EBA04@packeteer.com> <20010419183125.A57696@xor.obsecurity.org> <3ADF92DC.2B5A941D@packeteer.com> <20010419194710.A58378@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Okay-- I've solved this problem (for the edification of the rest who are in my boat) by cvsupping back to RELENG_4_2_0_RELEASE, applying the glob patch, rebuilding and reinstalling /usr/src/lib/libc and /usr/src/libexec/ftpd, and then cvsupping back to RELENG_4. Just a curiosity point, though... would I have been able to do a make buildworld, then make install only /usr/src/lib/libc? Just trying to see if that would have been a viable alternative that I could recommend to others... Brian Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 06:37:32PM -0700, Brian Tiemann wrote: > > I'm just trying to compile /usr/src/lib/libc. I suppose that's not > > going to work-- a make world will be indicated. Which really sucks for a > > production server. > > > > Yikes. And we were so close to making it to 4.3-RELEASE without an > > interim build... > > That's the trade-off you make when you cvsup -stable. If you have > lots of machines to update, or (sensibly) want to test it before > deploying on your production systems, just build world + test one a > scratch machine, then installworld via NFS on the target servers. > > Kris > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message