From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 05:52:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C32106566B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249B38FC17 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 05:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 9901774; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:52:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 9901772; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:52:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4CD24A11.9000604@radel.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:52:17 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020101010001050902020607" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:52:34 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020101010001050902020607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman = wrote: >> He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago >> and nothing's been fixed. > Seems to be fine from here: > > % nslookup -type=3Dany thought.org > Server: 192.168.100.1 > Address: 192.168.100.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > thought.org mail exchanger =3D 10 ethic.thought.org. > thought.org nameserver =3D ns2.everydns.net. > thought.org nameserver =3D ns1.thought.org. > > Authoritative answers can be found from: > > % host ethic.thought.org > ethic.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns1.thought.org > ns1.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns2.everydns.net > ns2.everydns.net has address 208.76.62.100 > % ping -c 3 ns2.everydns.net > PING ns2.everydns.net (208.76.62.100): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.684 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.073 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.046 ms > > --- ns2.everydns.net ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 107.046/107.268/107.684/0.295 ms > > Or am I misreading that? > > > You're overlooking the fact that ns2.everydns.net refuses to respond to=20 queries about thought.org, though it is happy to respond to queries=20 about everydns.net. When half the servers for your zone refuse to=20 answer, things work less than 100%. On the other hand, I don't think=20 things are completely broken. Actually they're less broken than Gary's=20 DNS frequently is; it gets discussed on a regular basis for a reason. So is the last octet of ns1.thought.org's address 209 or 210? ;-) --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. --------------ms020101010001050902020607--