From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 06:50:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFBB1065676 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABD18FC17 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o516o4jm072605 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o516o4EW072604; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:50:04 GMT Message-Id: <201006010650.o516o4EW072604@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Alexander Cc: Subject: Re: gnu/146716: gcc(1)] gcc CPU detection error X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 06:50:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR gnu/146716; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander To: Garrett Cooper Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnu/146716: gcc(1)] gcc CPU detection error Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:39:48 +0200 So this: /usr/bin/gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. is not from base?? Are you sure about that? ----- Message from yanefbsd@gmail.com --------- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 16:11:08 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: gnu/146716: gcc(1)] gcc CPU detection error To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@nagilum.org > This isn't a problem with the base system version of the compiler > though, so I would argue that it's not appropriately classified and/or > filed; it should be noted as an issue upstream -- which it is -- > and/or potentially a ports bug warranting a gcc upgrade. > Thanks, > -Garrett > ----- End message from yanefbsd@gmail.com ----- ======================================================================== # _ __ _ __ http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 # # / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _ nagilum@nagilum.org \n +491776461165 # # / / _ `/ _ `/ / / // / ' \ Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux # # /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/ Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / Linux / MacOS-X # # /___/ x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k ARM9: EPOC EV6 # ======================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------- cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs..