From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 24 13:00:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7049106568F; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882C28FC16; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A0B246B06; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:00:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 98A4F8A01B; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:00:30 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:59:47 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-CBSD-20091103; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <4B317741.8080004@freebsd.org> <4B32CADA.4010407@freebsd.org> <20091223221219.4416cef6@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20091223221219.4416cef6@kan.dnsalias.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912240759.47703.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:00:30 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: threads@freebsd.org, David Xu Subject: Re: first patch for process-shared semaphore X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:00:31 -0000 On Wednesday 23 December 2009 10:12:19 pm Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:58:50 +0800 > David Xu wrote: > > > Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:22:34 +0800 > > > David Xu wrote: > > >> libthr does not require semaphore, it implements semaphore, > > >> it is easier than other ways to implement the process-shared. > > >> > > > Let me rephrase: I do not think semaphores belong in libthr. They > > > should be either in libc or in librt. > > > > > > > > OK, does others really implement semaphore in librt ? > > unfortunately, the librt already requires libpthread to implement > > SIGEV_THREAD. > > I retract that. It appears that there is no consistency - Solaris put > these into libc, Linux into libpthread ans SUSv2 hints that these > belong with realtime functions. libthr is fine. I vote for libc. Single-threaded processes can use sem_open() and PSHARED sem_init() as well. Single-threaded processes can even use non-PSHARED sem_init() by using fork() to create new "threads" that share the semaphore. -- John Baldwin