From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 3 04:34:08 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA01932 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 3 Jul 1995 04:34:08 -0700 Received: from minnow.render.com (render.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.118]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA01923 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 1995 04:33:58 -0700 Received: (from dfr@localhost) by minnow.render.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id LAA05921; Mon, 3 Jul 1995 11:07:36 +0100 Date: Mon, 3 Jul 1995 11:07:35 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" cc: Ollivier Robert , "Rodney W. Grimes" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMC ethernet codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 2 Jul 1995, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jul 1995, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > > > can someone verify that 00:c0:4f:de:b3:a9 belongs to SMC? > > > > > > I though all SMC addresses (or at least the ones I have seen) > > > start 00:00:c0, maybe the used this block up :).) > > > > There is no trace of 00:c0:* in rfc-1700... > > > > 0080C2 IEEE 802.1 Committee > > 0080D3 Shiva > > 00AA00 Intel > > 00DD00 Ungermann-Bass > > thanks for your responses. > > i will contact SMC and see what they have to say. hopefully it > is a new address space allocation.....else i have to figure whats wrong > with the code and my understanding of the data sheet. ;( I have 11 SMC 8216 cards here, all with addresses starting with 00:00:c0. SMC seem to be using this prefix consistently for new cards. -- Doug Rabson, Microsoft RenderMorphics Ltd. Mail: dfr@render.com Phone: +44 171 251 4411 FAX: +44 171 251 0939