From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Dec 23 9:26:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ED3150B1 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 09:26:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) id 121C07-0004Ta-00; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:26:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22071; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:26:06 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:26:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Alejandro Ramirez Cc: Stan Brown , Free BSD Questions list Subject: RE: fsck and large filesystems. In-Reply-To: <01f701bf4d68$b75b1340$d2630a0a@megared.net.mx> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Alejandro Ramirez wrote: > It is supposed that if you are using softupdates, you will not have to >run fsck again, but its still enabled by default, just to make sure that >everything its ok (by now), this its a quote from a talk with Mr. Kirk >Mckusick at FreeBSDCon. So does this mean softupdates obviates the need to run fsck on an dirty partition? What about / if it isn't soft-enabled? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message