From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 3 19: 0:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wat-border.sentex.ca (waterloo-hespler.sentex.ca [199.212.135.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E27E37B517 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 19:00:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by wat-border.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA34725; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:00:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp.simianscience.com (ospf-mdt.sentex.net [205.211.164.81]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA17004; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:00:26 -0400 (EDT) From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What to expect in 3.5? Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 01:57:52 GMT Message-ID: <38e94b37.348986125@mail.sentex.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 3 Apr 2000 07:46:39 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >Hi, > >What are we likely to see extra in 3.5, as I'm not touching the 4 branch >until it's 4.1? I would not be too worried about 4.x. To date, it has been very stable for me in 3 production machines which are heavily used including a DNEWS news server. I plan to put two more into service in the next two weeks. 4.0R is really quite good. STABLE as of today is even better. ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message