Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 May 2006 15:41:47 -0500
From:      "Ben Kaduk" <minimarmot@gmail.com>
To:        "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] if_dc cleanups..
Message-ID:  <47d0403c0605241341k54586435xa76fa1e90a9e408e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200605241556.44483.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <200605241556.44483.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/24/06, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I've changed if_dc to use the full 32-bit device ID instead of just the l=
ower
> 16-bit device ID in dc_attach() so that it doesn't have to deal with hack=
s
> like the FAKE device and to make it easier to add new device IDs that hav=
e
> collisions in the future.  I've compiled it but have no dc(4) hardware to
> test with, so please test.  Patch is available at:
>
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/if_dc.patch
>
> --
> John Baldwin
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=
"
>

John,

I have an old machine running 6.0 with a dc card in it.  Will I need
to stop making excuses and bring this machine up to HEAD to test this
patch properly?

-Ben Kaduk



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47d0403c0605241341k54586435xa76fa1e90a9e408e>