Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:31:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org>, erwin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/p5-RTx-Statistics Makefile Message-ID: <49E4C857.40903@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090414101451.GA73770@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <200904112248.n3BMm6mo021412@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090412193542.3F8C38FC3B@release.ixsystems.com> <49E2F106.5090506@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20090413112958.1b6df281@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20090413113505.GA53293@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20090414101451.GA73770@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig201679827304ED94E1A44CD1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2009-Apr-13 12:35:05 +0100, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophil=
e.co.uk> wrote:
>> The patch Edwin applied before broke under QAT testing because the
>> www/rt38 port layout is now completely different to www/rt36 and
>> earlier, breaking the dependency checking. www/rt36 is on the old
>> layout, so should be fine. Even so, internal changes in rt38 code
>> mean that the various graphs this port would have produced no longer
>> work correctly, so best to leave it depending on www/rt36 instead.
>=20
> Is it worth explicitly making it conflict with www/rt38? At present,
> if you already have rt38 installed, p5-RTx-Statistics will build and
> then fail to install or work with a non-obvious error message. A
> CONFLICTS line could explicitly explain what the problem is.
>=20
Yes. That would be nice. Unfortunately it won't work: you'ld still see e=
xactly
the same output -- the conflicts message between rt36 and rt38 when rt36 =
is
attempted to be installed as a BUILD_DEPENDS of p5-RTx-Statistics. It's =
a rather
a shame that CONFLICTS is not applied until just before the install phase=
for any
port -- sometimes that's right and proper, other times it results in a wa=
sted
build of a port that will refuse to be installed.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
--------------enig201679827304ED94E1A44CD1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEAREIAAYFAknkyF0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyIJgCfV8X6ZbXrtoaCfKOAsQNjoc1O
vfgAmgPcuYKi2oVbXlChVtIW6zNx7fGW
=PJ12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig201679827304ED94E1A44CD1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E4C857.40903>