Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 01:54:39 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Things to remove from /rescue Message-ID: <20030717085439.GC35337@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030717015052.B46015@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20030717080805.GA98878@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030717084333.GB35337@funkthat.com> <20030717015052.B46015@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:50 -0700:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:43:33AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > David O'Brien wrote this message on Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:08 -0700:
> > > - ipfw & natd & ipf & ipfs & ipfstat & ipmon & ipnan, why would one needs
> > > these? /rescue is to fix a borked /, not replace PicoBSD.
> >
> > ipfw I can see as useful. If you have a kernel that defaults to closed,
> > and you need to access the network, then this is a problem. If we had
>
> actually, this is trivial to fix:
>
> sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0
I didn't know about this. :)
My objection to removing it has been removed. :) I now support removing
ipfw and friends (from /rescue).
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030717085439.GC35337>