From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 26 14:41:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BD01065671 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C98A13C46B for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3C31CDCC; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:41:04 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:41:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local> In-Reply-To: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802261541.03781.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E4chler_Philippe?= Subject: Re: ARP Messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:41:08 -0000 On Tuesday 26 February 2008 13:14:11 M=E4chler Philippe wrote: > %netstat -rn > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use > Netif Expire > 192.168.2 192.168.3.254 UGS 0 8209 > bge1 > 192.168.3 link#2 UC 0 0 > bge1 These routes look fishy. It shouldn't have a route for 192.168.2 cause it's= =20 nowhere defined, so it should go through default, not through bge1. Any=20 chance a machine on your network has 192.168.2/24 and publishing it, where = it=20 should be 80.242 something? Try route delete 192.168.2.0 and see if it clears. =2D-=20 Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.