Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 00:53:28 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: keramida@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. Message-ID: <20020306005328.B6921@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020305.233552.104015606.imp@village.org>; from imp@village.org on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:35:52PM -0700 References: <20020305155850.A38095@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020306000806.GC6839@hades.hell.gr> <20020305164054.B38095@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020305.233552.104015606.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:35:52PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : I was giving one. :-)
> : style(9) documents the practices of /sys. Thus we should not arbitaryly
> : add rules w/o them being backed up in code.
>
> I believe that sys/pccard, sys/dev/{pccard,pcic,pccbb,cardbus} tends
> to follow this rule. If you are looking for examples.
Older code than PCCARD. :-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020306005328.B6921>