From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Dec 5 0:50:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D07237B416 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 00:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.6bone.nl (penguin.ripe.net [193.0.1.232]) by birch.ripe.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id fB58o7G19450; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:50:07 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 33831 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 05 Dec 2001 08:50:07 -0000 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:50:07 +0100 From: Mark Santcroos To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: "Vladimir N. Silyaev" , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, Munehiro Matsuda Subject: Re: vmware2 build fails on -current today Message-ID: <20011205095007.P23525@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <86zo5h3jys.fsf@gradius.wdb.co.kr> <20011121002047G.haro@h4.dion.ne.jp> <20011121170430.A710@laptop.6bone.nl> <20011204113250.E23525@laptop.6bone.nl> <20011204104522.B620@server-ext.vns.oc.ca.ua> <20011204225027.D628@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011205092544.M23525@laptop.6bone.nl> <20011205003314.A4380@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011205003314.A4380@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>; from marcel@xcllnt.net on Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 12:33:14AM -0800 X-Handles: MS6-6BONE, MS18417-RIPE Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thats why I said 'can be' instead of 'should be'. (IOW I share your opinion about -CURRENT) I was just probing for your correctness :-) Either solution is fine with me. Mark On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 12:33:14AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:25:44AM +0100, Mark Santcroos wrote: > > Marcel, > > > > I think the OSVERSION to use for this can be 50027. > > It got bumped to this at 10/10/2001. The pmap change was after that. > > Yes. I'm in doubt, though. On the one hand I want the test to be > correct, meaning that I need to bump the version and test for 500028; > on the other hand I think it's overkill for -current, because you're > supposed to track -current, meaning that it's sufficient to test for > 500000... > > I tend to go for the former if I need to add a seperate test for > the patch... > > -- > Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message