From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 13:37:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E66610656A5 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED8B8FC0A for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAFD546B2E; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFFD78A04E; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:37:45 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: d@delphij.net Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:34:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100819; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4C770BB9.2070900@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <4C770BB9.2070900@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008270934.56323.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:37:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MACHINE_ARCH for boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:37:47 -0000 On Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:50:01 pm Xin LI wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i386 and > FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64. > > Comments welcome! I'll commit it in by the weekend if there is no > objection on this. As others have noted, the 'x86' is on purpose, and I would rather it continue to do that rather than this change. -- John Baldwin