From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 29 14:02:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1616037B404; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B0C43F85; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:02:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A585E; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:02:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C618378C4A; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:02:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:02:17 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Terry Lambert Message-ID: <20030429210217.GB18309@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Terry Lambert , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Vallo Kallaste , Tim Robbins References: <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428190209.A21656@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428080505.GA1474@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428105521.GB2676@madman.celabo.org> <20030428111859.GA2923@madman.celabo.org> <3EAECECB.ECB37B03@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EAECECB.ECB37B03@mindspring.com> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Vallo Kallaste cc: Tim Robbins cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: Somethings still up with new NSS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 21:02:20 -0000 On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:13:15PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > It probably would have been better to just put a per record byte > order maker in there, instead of using a version number, but you > would still have the same problem for the records without the > marker, so you'd have to ignore them as "suspect". There _is_ a per-record marker. See my posting to -arch yesterday if interested. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se