From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 07:39:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE10106566B; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lstewart@freebsd.org) Received: from lauren.room52.net (lauren.room52.net [210.50.193.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DAE8FC15; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lstewart1.loshell.room52.net (ppp59-167-184-191.static.internode.on.net [59.167.184.191]) by lauren.room52.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C9537E8C6; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:39:41 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4F13D43C.2060207@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:39:40 +1100 From: Lawrence Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111016 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Xu References: <201201160615.q0G6FE9r019542@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201201160615.q0G6FE9r019542@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lauren.room52.net Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r230201 - head/lib/libc/gen X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:39:42 -0000 On 01/16/12 17:15, David Xu wrote: > Author: davidxu > Date: Mon Jan 16 06:15:14 2012 > New Revision: 230201 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230201 > > Log: > Insert read memory barriers. > > Modified: > head/lib/libc/gen/sem.c > head/lib/libc/gen/sem_new.c Could you please provide a bit more information about why these are necessary and why they weren't there before (or how you figured out that there was a problem without them)? I learn a lot by reading commit mail, but only when the log message and any added code comments explain the "what" *and* the "why". Cheers, Lawrence