From owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Wed Sep 16 03:10:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC019CEDB9 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6E41384; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5E6871F1D; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:10:30 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Cave-Ayland Cc: Marius Strobl , "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: PCI range checking under qemu-system-sparc64 Message-ID: <20150916031030.GA6711@FreeBSD.org> References: <557DF887.20508@ilande.co.uk> <20150906110308.GA68829@FreeBSD.org> <55EC2E8D.4020803@ilande.co.uk> <20150906124859.GA14919@FreeBSD.org> <20150907203152.GA70457@alchemy.franken.de> <55EDFE00.9090109@ilande.co.uk> <20150913022143.GA7862@alchemy.franken.de> <20150913103940.GA60101@FreeBSD.org> <20150913180126.GC7862@alchemy.franken.de> <55F89861.1030107@ilande.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55F89861.1030107@ilande.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:10:30 -0000 On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:14:57PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > Aha - I bet that's it. I've tweaked OpenBIOS to update phys_mid the same > as "assigned-addresses" and that now gives me the following for /pci/ebus: > > [...] > Properly formatted, ranges now looks like this: > > 00000010 00000000 02001810 00000000 03000000 01000000 > 00000014 00000000 01001814 00000000 00004000 00004000 > > ...and in my tests here it doesn't appear to regress any of my test > images. As I still don't have a FreeBSD environment setup yet, I've > uploaded the binary to http://www.ilande.co.uk/tmp/openbios-sparc64 - if > someone with QEMU 2.4 could replace openbios-sparc64 with the downloaded > version and post a boot log in -nographic mode then that would be great. Log is identical to the one I posted earlier (modulo the build timestamps), except this part: eeprom0: addr 0x1400002000-0x1400003fff on ebus0 -eeprom0: cannot allocate resources -device_attach: eeprom0 attach returned 6 +eeprom0: model mk48t59 ebus0: addr 0 (no driver attached) -ebus0: addr 0x14000003f8-0x14000003ff irq 43 (no driver attached) +uart0: <16550 or compatible> addr 0x14000003f8-0x14000003ff irq 43 on ebus0 +uart0: console (9600,n,8,1) ebus0: addr 0x1400000060-0x1400000067 (no driver attached) Kernel still hangs at the same place. > BTW does the comment on D2791 mean that it has been superseded by a new > patch that has been committed to trunk? Yes, it was committed as part of r287726. Because commit log did not have reference to D2791, it had to be closed/abandoned by hand. ./danfe