From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 21 15:07:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA03286 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 21 May 1996 15:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA03277 for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 15:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with ESMTP id XAA08656; Tue, 21 May 1996 23:00:39 +0100 (BST) To: Terry Lambert cc: kline@tera.com (Gary Kline), freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Utilities and POSIX compliance.... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 May 1996 14:01:07 PDT." <199605212101.OAA02018@phaeton.artisoft.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 23:00:38 +0100 Message-ID: <8654.832716038@palmer.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Terry Lambert wrote in message ID <199605212101.OAA02018@phaeton.artisoft.com>: > I believe they are all i18n. The general consensus is to not > POSIX'ify if there will be a significant loss of functionality, > or if doing so would mean moving from a BS source to a GPL'ed one. ^^ That's ``BSD'' not ``Back Space'' or ``Bull S***'', before anyone gets wise :-) Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info