From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 3 9: 4:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mailgw1.prontomail.com (mailgw1.prontomail.com [209.185.149.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33E837BC24 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 09:04:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tkato@prontomail.ne.jp) Received: from mail46.prontomail.com (209.185.149.146) by mailgw1.prontomail.com (NPlex 4.5.049) id 38FE665B0016643B for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 3 May 2000 09:04:47 -0700 Received: from web10 (209.185.149.210) by mail46.prontomail.com (NPlex 2.0.123); Wed, 3 May 2000 09:04:19 -0700 From: "KATO Tsuguru" Message-Id: <2E28327400124D11781400807C90AA21@tkato.prontomail.ne.jp> Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 01:04:44 +0900 X-Priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP To: asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: print/ghostscript5 broken by libpng upgade (was Re: Gnomeprint port broken) Cc: kythorn@scorched.com, ade@FreeBSD.org, ache@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Web Based Pronto Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I've heard that a while ago, they *still* haven't fixed it? Gee, it's > only some copyright strings, right? Why does it take so long? Probably 'packaging script' is the key. What the author is trying to do might be far more complicated than we expected. > And will you be taking up committership by then so you can commit it > yourself? :) Ghostscript sounds horrible to me. I'm too weak to confront with such a haunted software.... -- KATO Tsuguru / tkato@prontomail.ne.jp Sent by Japanese ProntoMail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message