From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 00:13:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFB516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:13:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shell.reiteration.net (82-34-179-228.cable.ubr01.sout.blueyonder.co.uk [82.34.179.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C2943D58 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@reiteration.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=reiteration.net) by shell.reiteration.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D5Yex-000NYx-1e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:21:15 +0000 From: "John" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:21:12 +0000 Message-Id: <20050228001801.M94088@reiteration.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.50 20050106 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.1.7 (jfm) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lists@reiteration.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shell.reiteration.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: FW: Installation instructions for Firefox somewhere? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:13:23 -0000 On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:26:08 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote > I brought this issue up a month or so ago. The problem was caused > by during the 4.11 development the ports people decided it was to > cpu intensive to do nightly builds of the INDEX file. So they > stopped doing it. Later on when the release was done what should > have been done wnen making up the CD is they should have done a make > index first, then copied the files to the CD. Will I be able to use the refuse file now?? I am running 5.3-RELEASE but it has been cvsupped and made world a few times and it's up to patchlevel 3 I think. -- lists@reiteration.net