Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:14:16 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexandros Kosiaris <akosiaris@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Securelevels and /dev/io documentation inconsistency Message-ID: <20060712181416.GB38615@gothmog.pc> In-Reply-To: <cee728a70607121035k39efb17co41825fb18674b176@mail.gmail.com> References: <cee728a70607120547q51b3e45flfe22716fd28b8c83@mail.gmail.com> <20060712141153.GB30855@gothmog.pc> <cee728a70607121035k39efb17co41825fb18674b176@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-07-12 20:35, Alexandros Kosiaris <akosiaris@gmail.com> wrote: >>It looks like it does. Would something like this be satisfactory? >> >> 1 Secure mode - the system immutable and system >> append-only flags may not be turned off; disks for >> mounted file systems, /dev/mem and /dev/kmem may not be >> opened for writing and /dev/io (if your platform has it) >> may not be opened at all; kernel modules (see kld(4)) >> may not be loaded or unloaded. >> >>Regards, >>Giorgos > > Yes it would be. Thank you. It should be fixed in HEAD now, with this commit: Revision Changes Path 1.47 +4 -3 src/share/man/man7/security.7 After a short period (3 days or so), if there are no objections, corrections or other changes by fellow committers, I'll merge the change to RELENG_6 too. Thanks :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060712181416.GB38615>