From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 15:56:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441B9106566B for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ap@bnc.net) Received: from mailomat.net (mailomat.net [81.20.89.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA808FC1F for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:56:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailomat-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] X-Mailomat-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Mailomat-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] Received: from [194.39.192.125] (account bnc-mail@mailrelay.mailomat.net HELO bnc.net) by mailomat.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.15) with ESMTPSA id 55876308; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:56:01 +0100 X-Junk-Score: 2 [X] X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Received: from [192.168.200.189] (account ap@bnc.net HELO [192.168.200.189]) by bnc.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with ESMTPSA id 5180397; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:56:00 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Achim Patzner X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <93F94D7970EC47D88A2DF9C7F726BF75@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:56:00 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <98446ADF-D4DB-4666-BC82-A7259CC30EEB@bnc.net> References: <93F94D7970EC47D88A2DF9C7F726BF75@multiplay.co.uk> To: Steven Hartland X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:56:06 -0000 Am 17.01.2012 um 20:54 schrieb Steven Hartland: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Kozubik" >> It's amazing how many people are in the exact same boats - waiting = for 8.3, getting locked out of new motherboards because em(4) can't be = "backported" to even the production release... >=20 > This is not true, only last week did we take the version of e1000 from > HEAD into our 8.2-RELEASE tree as a patch. It wasnt totally trivial = but > it also wasnt difficult either. But it would still be preferable for > many not to have to do this I assume? freebsd-update its the keyword. Many of our customers could use (and do = - most of them are paying peanuts for their IT staff) trained monkeys = for system upgrades if they stay on -RELEASE steps. Alternatively: Use properly versioned binaries and get freebsd-update = working on arbitrary versions. Achim