From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Oct 17 01:00:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA13522
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 01:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA13193
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 00:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.7.5/8.6.12) id KAA17895; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 10:51:11 +0300 (EET DST)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 10:51:11 +0300 (EET DST)
From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
cc: dg@Root.COM, Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>,
        Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>, jdw@wwwi.com,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5 
In-Reply-To: <199610161113.EAA04958@rah.star-gate.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961017104643.17620A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 16 Oct 1996, Amancio Hasty wrote:

> 
> I think that it will be wise to release 2.2 soon. It is getting uncomfortable
> for both users or ISPs and developers.

Soon? If something even remotedly stable is to be released, then IMHO a 
new branch should be created soon and 2.2.0-prerelease-stable put up for 
testing for say ~1.5 - 2 months? If people can say yeah, it's stable, it 
has been out for quite some time then we can make the release and be 
comfort - most people will see long uptimes and the image of FreeBSD as a 
stable OS will remain.

	Sander

> 
> 	Amancio
> 
> 
>