From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 22 18:15:47 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E313106567E
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355398FC17
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org>) id 1T4FT0-0005tl-OH
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:15:46 +0200
Received: from 187.64.223.198 ([187.64.223.198])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:15:46 +0200
Received: from rakuco by 187.64.223.198 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:15:46 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:15:35 -0300
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <87obm2iyig.fsf@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CABG_4jnNGtn5Ge_tgakEHUv+h5YbP3e-V1PmwMXhT9xNO9k1Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87y5l74yoo.fsf@FreeBSD.org> <87pq6j4xj9.fsf@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 187.64.223.198
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s2DN9LcYlTK0dHYrP73sOvTnd0w=
Subject: Re: raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:15:47 -0000

Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> writes:

> Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>
>> Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
>> or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if
>> -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before
>> -I/usr/local/include.
>
> Everything built fine without the {CPP,LD}FLAGS additions here. I'm
> tempted to commit that change, but wonder if it will end up breaking
> some weird setup...

Coming to think of it again, removing those lines changing {CPP,LD}FLAGS
would have an impact if one is using openssl from ports, as the check
for MD5() in libcrypto.so would be done for the library in base, not
${LOCALBASE}.