From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Jun 4 19:20:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-doc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA03410 for doc-outgoing; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 19:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailbox.neosoft.com (mailbox.neosoft.com [206.109.1.16]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA03341 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 19:19:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bonkers.taronga.com (root@bonkers.neosoft.com [206.109.2.48]) by mailbox.neosoft.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA06438 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 21:19:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA20501; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 21:18:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 21:18:37 -0500 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Message-Id: <199606050218.VAA20501@bonkers.taronga.com> To: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I write this SGML stuff? Newsgroups: taronga.freebsd.doc In-Reply-To: <199606050126.BAA11608@gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov> References: <199606050020.TAA18778@bonkers.taronga.com> Organization: none Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >But it still doesn't answer the question. If the DTD and the >replacement rules are up to snuff, it doesn't matter whether we go to >TeX, troff, Scribe, or who knows what. Sure it does. I need to install and maintain it locally, and even with packages and ports I don't want to have to keep a copy of TeX "live" just to generate documentation. TeX and I just don't get along... Plus troff code run through nroff looks pretty good. Much better than the straight "plain text" output of Linuxdoc.