From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Dec 23 9:44:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from unix.megared.net.mx (megamail.megared.com.mx [207.249.162.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FBB1567D for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 09:44:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ales@megared.net.mx) Received: from ales (pix.gdl.megared.net.mx [207.249.162.253]) by unix.megared.net.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA46482; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:41:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ales@megared.net.mx) Message-ID: <02c301bf4d6d$1f6a56e0$d2630a0a@megared.net.mx> From: "Alejandro Ramirez" To: "Jonathon McKitrick" Cc: "Stan Brown" , "Free BSD Questions list" References: Subject: RE: fsck and large filesystems. Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:42:46 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Alejandro Ramirez wrote: > > > It is supposed that if you are using softupdates, you will not have to > >run fsck again, but its still enabled by default, just to make sure that > >everything its ok (by now), this its a quote from a talk with Mr. Kirk > >Mckusick at FreeBSDCon. > > So does this mean softupdates obviates the need to run fsck on an dirty > partition? What about / if it isn't soft-enabled? Then if its not "soft-enabled", you should run fsck in it. Merry Xmas Ales To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message