From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 16 09:51:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD64106566B for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5413E8FC0C for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:f803:edca:622b:8392]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A84304AC1C for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:51:36 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:51:26 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <46157122.20110916135126@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <20110912230943.GD33455@guilt.hydra> <4E6E99BC.4050909@missouri.edu> <1315905051.1747.208.camel@xenon> <4E6F8A50.9060205@gmx.de> <1315942042.1747.258.camel@xenon> <4E6FD71D.9010207@gmx.de> <20110914181553.f6d31b0f.cjr@cruwe.de> <4E722F3F.3030606@wasikowski.net> <20110915180815.GA46983@guilt.hydra> <4E7247F2.7080207@wasikowski.net> <20110915183710.GA47127@guilt.hydra> <4E7253AF.7030602@wasikowski.net> <4E725782.3090107@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Thank you (for making the ports less boring). X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:51:38 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-ports. You wrote 16 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3.,= 0:28:07: >> Really? I thought it was supposed to be standard behaviour- the @stopdae= mon >> line in pkg-plist facilitates that. > While I totally understand why we do this, I have to say it's VERY > VERY annoying behavior especially when one upgrading a remote system > with multiple server daemon ports. One have to watch the whole > process carefully and restart the daemon manually. Yep, and even more annoyingly is that it is completely inconsistent: some daemons are stopped, some not, etc. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov