From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 16:07:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF729C18 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B171E80 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-85-234.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.85.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CB3025325; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 18:07:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t64G7QWx005527; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 18:07:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 18:07:26 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Quartz Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best console hardware monitor pkg? Message-Id: <20150704180726.b46748f7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <55980239.9010601@sneakertech.com> References: <559760A3.7000901@sneakertech.com> <20150704150742.cd7c045a.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150704092041.03767068@seibercom.net> <5597F233.7090201@sneakertech.com> <20150704170548.fc12bd39.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150704161736.7025b3e187c9efbe119b1cc6@sohara.org> <5597FACB.3050506@sneakertech.com> <5597FBCD.2060001@hiwaay.net> <55980239.9010601@sneakertech.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 16:07:30 -0000 On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:56:41 -0400, Quartz wrote: > >>> Counterintuitively this means that the package for xmbmon installs > >>> mbmon. > >> > >> OK just to clarify: if you install xbmon through pkg, you also get > >> mbmon as well (which can be used without X)? > > > > > > You get mbmon & *not* xmbmon*, hence the counterintuitive assessment: > > Wait, the "xmbmon" package as installed though pkg doesn't actually > install the X version? wat Yes. :-) Due to the combination of mbmon and xmbmon into one package, the "least dangerous interpretation" has been chosen, and that is the one without X support. > I guess that's technically good for my needs in this case, but I wonder > about sanity levels here.... that's kind of a big mistake, and if future > versions of the package flip things around then maybe I shouldn't trust it. It would probably have made more sense to call the combined package simply mbmon, with a "make configure" step if you wanted it with X support - which means that the list of runtime dependencies would grow. The "x" in "xmobon" package naming therefore is a bit confusing, as it refers to the option of X support, not a default X support... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...