From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Mar 18 21:47:38 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A3C37BB82
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 18 Mar 2000 21:47:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12476;
	Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:47:26 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA05290; Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:47:21 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200003190547.WAA05290@harmony.village.org>
To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org>
Subject: Re: Patch to introduce bpfdetach(), Re: BPF question (FreeBSD 40) 
Cc: Kurakin Roman <rik@cronyx.ru>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Mar 2000 21:21:36 EST."
		<Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000318204927.3649A-300000@fledge.watson.org> 
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000318204927.3649A-300000@fledge.watson.org>  
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:47:21 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In message <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000318204927.3649A-300000@fledge.watson.org> Robert Watson writes:
: Pccard drivers such as ep0 don't require the patch, as they never
: ifdetach(), leaving the ifnet epX around but unbound.

But ep does call if_detach():

static int
ep_pccard_detach(device_t dev)
{
...
	if_detach(&sc->arpcom.ac_if);
...
}

all the network pccard drivers do this.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message