From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 22:04:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC6B1065676 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from cell.p6m7g8.net (static-71-178-236-107.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.236.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3157B8FC17 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net [174.79.184.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by cell.p6m7g8.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5OM4NBZ084830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:04:23 GMT (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Message-ID: <4C23D666.6000300@p6m7g8.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:04:22 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100607 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Williams References: <201006241608.o5OG85G80090@sbw.org> In-Reply-To: <201006241608.o5OG85G80090@sbw.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on cell.p6m7g8.net Cc: apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mod_wsgi port for Apache 2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:04:29 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/10 16:07, Steve Williams wrote: > I'm curious why there are a mod_wsgi ports for Apache 1.3, but not for > Apache 2. > > I was able to install mod_wsgi from source without difficulty. But I'd > prefer to use a port. So I'd like to know if there's a reason a port > for Apache 2 is not needed. > > My interest was prompted by this announcement: > > http://docs.webfaction.com/software/django/mod-migration.html There are 2 ports www/mod_wsgi www/mod_wsgi3 You probably want the 3 version. Both ports have: USE_APACHE=1.3+ which means they work with 1.3 and up versions of apache including 2.0.x and 2.2.x - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFMI9ZmdbiP+9ubjBwRAjOlAJ92Qn2cGEsZCUPDNwhwegn1yScrjQCfWYzi vAnjQBNxyt2hOprfSrkSot4= =dP/b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----