From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 26 17:00:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E271065670 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sjg@juniper.net) Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4708FC18 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT+nqrOxVcMwC1g103E8beIm7+QaLhO0s@postini.com; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:00:29 PDT Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:57:09 -0700 Received: from chaos.jnpr.net (chaos.jnpr.net [172.24.29.229]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id q5QGbAh67506; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sjg@juniper.net) Received: from chaos.jnpr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chaos.jnpr.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7452158081; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT) To: Eric van Gyzen In-Reply-To: <4FE9DCCE.1060104@vangyzen.net> References: <20120626063017.D05DA58081@chaos.jnpr.net> <86wr2uwdgf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20120626153335.3215258081@chaos.jnpr.net> <4FE9DCCE.1060104@vangyzen.net> Comments: In-reply-to: Eric van Gyzen message dated "Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:01:18 -0500." From: "Simon J. Gerraty" X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82+cvs; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:37:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20120626163710.7452158081@chaos.jnpr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allow user install X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:00:29 -0000 On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:01:18 -0500, Eric van Gyzen writes: >INSTALL_OWN is a bit cumbersome. Its name also doesn't cover other >privileged attributes, such as the schg flag. > >I like UNPRIVILEGED_INSTALL or USER_INSTALL. The user can set those to >tell the build system what he/she wants. The build system can then set >the other internal variables to make that happen. Those internal >variables can change over time, but the user will still get the right >behavior. > >The ports system uses INSTALL_AS_USER; the precedent is worth considering. Thanks - assuming the functionality is wanted, some agreement on the name of the knob will arise.