From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 11 02:16:12 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BB4106566C;
	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:16:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1E98FC0A;
	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:16:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 421DA5615D; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:16:12 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:16:12 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20110311021612.GB14159@lonesome.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Fwd: prelminary analysis of the gmake3.82 -exp run
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:16:12 -0000

I recent did a first-pass experimental ports run with gmake3.82.  The
results from that were pretty bad: 38 confirmed errors (5 more possible),
with ~1100 ports as collateral damage, mostly from audio/portaudio and
devel/p5-Module-Build.

After a brief discussion among the portmgrs, we decided to make another
run with some patches (see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155215)
to try to narrow down the collateral damage, before notifying individual
maintainers.  However, here's the information for those that want to get
a head start on doing the work.

Note that the new 'gmake' error classification has been added to the results;
OTOH, many regressions will be classified as 'makefile'.  It depends on how,
exactly, the build failure occurred.

mcl

----- Forwarded message from Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> -----

Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 20:49:28 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: aDe@FreeBSD.org
Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: prelminary analysis of gmake -exp run
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

http://pointyhat-west.isc.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.8-exp.20110304064411.pointyhat-west/index-category.html

definitely gmake:

audio/portaudio 
biology/grappa 
cad/varkon 
deskutils/contacts 
devel/ORBit 
devel/allegro 
devel/cil 
devel/deputy 
devel/hyena 
devel/libarena 
devel/p5-Module-Build 
devel/psptoolchain-binutils 
games/grubik 
games/lgeneral 
games/pinball 
games/xconq 
graphics/stamp 
irc/xchat-gnome 
mail/ifile 
misc/gnustep-examples 
multimedia/mythtv-frontend 
net/gupnp-igd 
net/proxy-suite 
net/xtraceroute 
sysutils/gkrellm 
sysutils/isomd5sum 
sysutils/lire 
sysutils/slmon 
textproc/domc 
www/rubygem-railties 
www/rubygem-activeresource 
www/seamonkey 
www/swish++ 
x11-toolkits/gtkextra 
x11-toolkits/v 
x11-toolkits/vdkbuilder 
x11-wm/awesome 
x11/xnee 

not sure, someone needs to investigate:

devel/cc65 
games/sarien 
lang/io 
multimedia/tstools 

not gmake (they break elsewhere):

chinese/scim-chewing 
chinese/tin 
comms/usbmuxd 
deskutils/doodle 
deskutils/xfce4-notification-daemon 
devel/fossology 
devel/otrs 
devel/py-sendfile 
dns/dhid 
graphics/gegl 
net-p2p/gnunet 
news/tin 
print/latex-prettyref 
sysutils/garcon 
www/foswiki-ModPerlEngineContrib 

----- End forwarded message -----