Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 01:14:59 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Brian Handy <handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu> Cc: asami@FreeBSD.ORG, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha ports collection? Message-ID: <199812310815.BAA61494@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Dec 1998 23:16:10 MST." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812302308530.14312-100000@lambic.physics.montana.edu> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812302308530.14312-100000@lambic.physics.montana.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812302308530.14312-100000@lambic.physics.montana.edu> Brian Handy writes:
: ===> Building for asapm-2.3
: cc -O -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include -c apm_react.c
: cc -O -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include -c apm_rc.c
: cc -O -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include -c apm_read.c
: apm_read.c:24: machine/apm_bios.h: No such file or directory
This file doesn't exist on the alpha because APM is x86 specific.
: I don't see any hope for fixing this. (A cursory browse of the OpenBSD
: Alpha source tree confirmed they don't have this file either.) I don't
: know if there's been some sort of BROKEN_ALPHA flag invented yet, but this
: port is a strong candidate for that if it becomes the case.
NetBSD and OpenBSD both have
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS - If a port only makes sense to certain architectures, this
is a list containing the names for them. It is checked
against the predefined ${MACHINE_ARCH} value
>From looking at the last bsd.port.mk file that I have on my system, it
appears that this isn't present in FreeBSD yet.
For the moment, the best way to fix this is to add something like:
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "i386"
BROKEN="Only for APM enabled Intel machines"
.endif
to the Makefile for the port.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812310815.BAA61494>