From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 20:25:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBCB16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:25:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it (vsmtp1.tin.it [212.216.176.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A841E43D2F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:25:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rionda@gufi.org) Received: from kaiser.sig11.org (82.52.118.28) by vsmtp1.tin.it (7.0.027) id 4238611B00572BCE for freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:25:07 +0200 Received: by kaiser.sig11.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DFF564B; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:25:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:25:07 +0200 From: Matteo Riondato To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050329202507.GF916@kaiser.sig11.org> References: <20050329201005.GE916@kaiser.sig11.org> <45221.1112127225@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45221.1112127225@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/36392: [feature request] cron starts before vi recover, and vi recover isnt dont securely X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:25:10 -0000 --DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:13:45PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050329201005.GE916@kaiser.sig11.org>, Matteo Riondato write= s: > >On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:03:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <200503292000.j2TK0Dl6082442@freefall.freebsd.org>, Matteo = Rio=3D > >ndato=3D20 > >> writes: > > > >Do you think that we should not even run virecover on such systems or > >that we should not send a mail to the user?=3D20 >=20 > It's the mail-sending bit which bugs me, in some configurations this > simply hangs boot for how ever long it takes for it to realize that > it can't. Don't know if this matters, but sendmail (or whatever MTA) is started _after_ virecover..Would it be possible/useful to delay mail delivery after sendmail has been started? --=20 Rionda aka Matteo Riondato Disinformato per default G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org) --DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCSbmj2Mp4pR7Fa+wRAtItAJ0dJFqOatOfgMwU3jJzmiYr8CNCzwCfV8SO zg9fc89duFkIyYICp6n+lfQ= =9zMX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf--