Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 12:27:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: "Andrew N. Edmond" <edmond@shaman.lycaeum.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, monty@tcx.se Subject: Re: is libc_r broken in 980520-SNAP (and stable?)? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980617122231.895E-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> In-Reply-To: <199806170244.MAA10102@cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, John Birrell wrote: > Andrew N. Edmond wrote: > > I've been working with Monty at www.tcx.se (makers of MySQL - the best > > free SQL database, ever :), and we've been having a very difficult time > > with the libc_r in 980520-SNAP (clean install). > > There are a few unwelcome features that should be fixed now in -current. One thing that confuses me is that how does libc_r from 2.2.6-stable and -current compare these days? They used to be identical, but now that -current is getting kernel support for threads and alpha stuff, I assume that they must be quite different now. Primarily, is libc_r from 2.2.6-stable just as usable as libc_r from current? Highwind Software (www.highwind.com) has a beta version of their news software that it is statically linked to a libc_r with fixes they say they got from you. Would this be a -stable libc_r or a -current libc_r that they are using? Sigh, I apologize for the number of questions... Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980617122231.895E-100000>