From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 22:34:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08665106564A for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB338FC12 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Psjlc-0004wF-Hc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:34:36 +0100 Received: from static-87-79-237-121.netcologne.de ([87.79.237.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:34:36 +0100 Received: from tg by static-87-79-237-121.netcologne.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:34:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Thorsten Glaser Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <20110224213322.GA13089@guilt.hydra> <20110224221057.GA13262@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 87.79.237.121 (Opera/9.27 (X11; MirBSD i386; U; en)) Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:34:38 -0000 Chad Perrin apotheon.com> writes: > 1. You think some measure of popularity of a decision makes it correct. No. > 2. You don't like (t)csh. No. I just point out it’s not a suitable scripting shell. > 3. You think your opinions are so self-evident that everybody will just > immediately understand them, their reasoning, and the best way to proceed > from there. I may have some shortcomings when it comes to getting a point across. > 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh? Probably. (Even Android uses mksh these days.) But that’s up to you guys. On the other hand, it’s tradition. But then, I never asked for this (here, I did in other places) either. See above. Anyway, goodnight (and I’ll probably not get back to this thread, just hope to have brought some thought-provoking impulse).