From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 16:40:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E781065688 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270018FC13 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q09GeBfB054450 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q09GeAp5054449; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:40:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:40:10 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201201091640.q09GeAp5054449@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Nick Hibma Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F226106564A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from red.freebsd.org (red.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6DA8FC13 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q09GZWEY077157 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:35:32 GMT (envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q09GZWek077156; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:35:32 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <201201091635.q09GZWek077156@red.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:35:32 GMT From: Nick Hibma To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1 Cc: Subject: ports/163959: tincd rc.d script produces unneccessary warning X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:40:11 -0000 >Number: 163959 >Category: ports >Synopsis: tincd rc.d script produces unneccessary warning >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 09 16:40:10 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Nick Hibma >Release: 8-STABLE / current ports >Organization: AnyWi Technologies >Environment: Checked against ports tree in svn just now >Description: When starting tincd I get the following output: awlcr-default# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tincd onestart Starting tincd Cannot 'resync' ipfilter. Set ipfilter_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'oneresync' instead of 'resync'. I hate warnings, especially when they are wrong. >How-To-Repeat: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tincd onestart >Fix: Looking at /etc/rc.d/netif as stated in the rc.d script the following line /etc/rc.d/ipfilter resync should be replaced with /etc/rc.d/ipfilter quietresync to stop that warning (or at least I have not yet seen /etc/rc.d/netif produce any warning message like that). >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: