From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 6 18: 0:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038EA37B405 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:00:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from cascade (cascade.veldy.net [192.168.1.1]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E84ABAA8; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:00:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <003201c0eeed$47b57cb0$0101a8c0@cascade> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "David W . Chapman Jr ." Cc: References: <003f01c0eeeb$4d03bdf0$0101a8c0@cascade> <20010606195618.C47727@leviathan.inethouston.net> Subject: Re: IPFilter licence update Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:00:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You don't need GCC to run the system, only build it. Thus you can install a system that is ONLY BSD licensed code -- or at least, very close. I personally wouldn't mind if the whole system was GPL, versus BSD (I prefer the latter). However, the currently licensing is BSD and as such, the base system (contrib aside) can run with the GPL tools used to build it. Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "David W . Chapman Jr ." To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: "Gordon Tetlow" ; Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:56 PM Subject: Re: IPFilter licence update > On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:46:34PM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > I agree, it is his perogative. I am glad he wrote it. It is excellent > > software. However, he is making a choice and other people don't have to > > like it, based on sound OpenSource criteria (which he never claimed IPFilter > > was). He can not expect anybody else to feel that it is OK to have non-open > > software incorporated into the base system of an open OS. I say open the > > source up completely under the BSD or equivalent license (as released in the > > FreeBSD OS) or remove it from the base OS. > > > How would you compile anything without gcc or make do without any of > the gnu tools? > > -- > David W. Chapman Jr. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message