From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 03:42:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C311106567D for ; Thu, 8 May 2008 03:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B008FC16 for ; Thu, 8 May 2008 03:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m483foAN057597; Wed, 7 May 2008 21:41:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4822767E.8000006@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 21:41:50 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Hibbits References: <200805072310.30158.jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu> In-Reply-To: <200805072310.30158.jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Byteswap and UFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 03:42:02 -0000 Justin Hibbits wrote: > Are there any plans to add byteswapping into the UFS code, ala NetBSD? This > would be really useful for moving disks between architectures. I noticed pjd > was doing some work with this, but last thing I can find on it is a blog > entry from over a year ago. > > - Justin While a direct port from NetBSD is probably infeasible due to codebase differences, taking the work there as a guideline for doing it in FreeBSD would be incredibly useful. Is it something that you're interested in working on? Scott