Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 May 1997 03:29:45 -0700
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        Nik Clayton <nik@blueberry.co.uk>
Cc:        "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? 
Message-ID:  <199705141029.DAA06486@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 May 1997 09:59:07 BST." <19970514095907.40722@blueberry.co.uk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am going to investigate how can Thot support directly DocBook.
As Thot is it can export Thot (native format), LaTex, and HTML.

	Amancio



>From The Desk Of Nik Clayton :
> On Wed, May 14, 1997 at 01:05:50AM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > What I am pitching is for is that if Thot is good we can start advertising 
it
> > and hopefully standardize our internal documentation based on its format.
> > Internal documentation meaning things like : reports, articles, etc...
> 
> Um, whos internal documentation?
> 
> Yours (as in, your own personal stuff), or the FreeBSD project's (articles,
> FAQ, Handbook and so on).
> 
> If the latter, what's wrong with DocBook, particularly with John Fieber's
> first cut at tutorial documentation at 
> 
>     http://fallout.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber/docbook/markupguide.html
> 
> Or have I got the wrong end of the stick, and you can use Thot to write
> DocBook markup (at which point the masses start screaming "Emacs + psgml"
> :-) )
> 
> N
> -- 
> --+=[ Blueberry Hill                  Blueberry New Media                ]=+-
-
> --+=[ http://www.blueberry.co.uk/     1/9 Chelsea Harbour Design Centre, ]=+-
-
> --+=[ WebMaster@blueberry.co.uk       London, England, SW10 0XE          ]=+-
-
> --+=[       Those who do not read Dilbert are doomed to repeat it        ]ENT
P





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705141029.DAA06486>