From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 11 09:41:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA06607 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 09:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA06602 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 09:41:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA21551; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 10:44:10 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 10:44:10 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199601111744.KAA21551@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" Cc: Nate Williams , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arrrgh, this was working Sunday... In-Reply-To: <9601111739.AA15817@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> References: <9601040106.AA00652@tera.com> <9601111707.AA17486@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199601111732.KAA21487@rocky.sri.MT.net> <9601111739.AA15817@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > >> A normally configured system /does/ run a nameserver, if only to cache > >> the results of previous queries. > > > Hogwash. On my local network, is simply wasting memory and more > > maintenance to run a namserver on all the machines > > It doesn't take any maintenance at all to run a nameserver on all the > machines. I have to set them up to run, and when they die (which unfortunately they do :( ) I have to go re-start them. It's much easier to point everyone at the central site, so when it dies it's *very* obvious. Nate